Are the Government Responses Mistakes or on Purpose?

DBS

Are the Government Responses Mistakes or on Purpose?

Shortly after multiple datasets showing lower IFR came out (ten times lower than the 3% CFR still in the MSM) in mid April 2020 and on, many scientific and medical groups starting questioning and grouping together to highlight the good news that C19 is not as deadly as first feared, and that it is sharply age-stratified, even moreso than influenza (those 65+ with health issues are 1000-fold risk compared to 55 and under and healthy).  These same groups pointed out that the pandemic plan should be re-invoked – shield the old/vulnerable, let those 95% not at-risk go back to normal (Sweden and Florida did this).  Instead, governments ignored this and continued on isolating the healthy/all people with no explanation or even discussion with these groups (Great Barrington group, HART group, etc.)

Discussions after April or May 2020 started to increase as to ‘well the government is stupid’ because their locking down of healthy people was causing more death for younger healthy people compared to what they claim they were trying to save in the older vulnerable groups.  In addition, long term care homes most at risk purposely had C19 patients returned to them from hospital, only to cause major death counts.  New York, Ontario, the UK, these places all had proven policies whereby their governments ordered C19-ill patients to be turned out of hospital and sent back to their care homes, causing elevated death counts.

Health experts and pandemic planners have always known that lockdowns, loss of economic activity (job loss), loss of human interaction, loss of communication and connection, have negative effects on health and even increase deaths.  Suicides and deaths of despair are also known outcomes, which did happen throughout 2020-2022 among younger people (who were not at risk from C19, relatively).  So, were all governments messing this up and incompetent?  Or, more likely, was this all known and there was a bigger plan behind the daily theatre of distancing, death counters?  In politics, ‘nothing happens or gets done that isn’t planned’. There are numerous debates and articles arguing about whether all governments screwed up by mistake or did this on purpose.  Just like the pandemic itself, again if you believe this is a deadly plague that needs all measures thrown at it, then again stop reading.  Or even if you believe that governments made mistakes then stop reading here.

To me it is quite obvious that all ‘experts’ and governments knew the supposed cures would be worse than the disease. The goal of not using the traditional pandemic plans already in place for even worse diseases was to purposely set the precedent for future plans. That is, the old plans were to balance the health of society versus those at risk, since lockdowns and isolation are damaging to society. The new plans now set the narrative that lockdowns of ALL society regardless of risk are normal. Shutting schools and limiting children’s activity is normal even though it damages children. Masks all the time on healthy people is normal, even though up till 2020 it was accepted masking healthy people does nothing. All responses point to damaging society on purpose, in order to erase the old plans that relied on cooperation, societal cohesion, respect, and dignity.

Economic slowdowns are directly correlated to increased mortality, and this is obviously known by all leaders. “During years of falling GDP, death rates rise by 0.4 deaths per 1,000 people (4% of the mean). Child mortality rates surge by 4 deaths per 1,000 births (6% of the mean).” (Source: Bank for International Settlements: Recessions and Mortality.)

Donald Henderson, credited with eradicating smallpox, established the main pandemic plan cornerstone – keep the public and society functioning as normal as possible to maintain overall mental health. “Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted. Strong political and public health leadership to provide reassurance and to ensure that needed medical care services are provided are critical elements. If either is seen to be less than optimal, a manageable epidemic could move toward catastrophe.” (Source:  How a Free Society Deals with Pandemics, According to Legendary Epidemiologist and Smallpox Eradicator Donald Henderson – AIER). 

Instead, even knowing the mortality rate hit >95% of people over 75 and with 3 or more co-morbidities, all our governments chose to do the opposite. Isolate and treat all of society as if they were sick until proven well. Replace calmness with fear, finger-pointing, anger, collectivism, and the ‘if you are not with us you are against us’ mob mentality. If governments’ roles are to above all keep people calm, rational, and respectful for their own mental health, yet they are doing and did the exact opposite with fear, anger, division, and name-calling, then they must be doing this on purpose. In one more generation, the memory of how previous pandemics were handled (going back to normal after the disease goes endemic), will be erased. The majority of the young will gladly, out of fear and ignorance, accept the authoritarian narrative of how to react and how to behave, in order to fit in with the collective, virtue-signal that they are ‘doing our part’, and even police and threaten those who go against the rules.